Christomanos v. Vick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Christomanos v. Vick

95 A.D.3d 461, 942 N.Y.S.2d 870

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 3, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 95 A.D.3d 461 (Christomanos v. Vick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Christomanos v. Vick, 95 A.D.3d 461, 942 N.Y.S.2d 870 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), entered February 17, 2011, which, in an action for personal injuries arising out of a motor vehicle accident, granted defendant’s motion to change venue from Bronx County to Westchester County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant showed that the venue chosen by plaintiff was improper since none of the parties resided in Bronx County when the action was commenced (see Hernandez v Seminatore, 48 AD3d 260 [2008]; CPLR 503 [a]; 510 [1]). Defendant submitted, inter alia, the records of the Department of Motor Vehicles showing that she resided in Westchester County when the action was commenced and her affidavit stating that she exclusively lived in Westchester County at that time (see Weiss v WalMart Stores E., L.P., 83 AD3d 461 [2011]).

In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact as to whether defendant resided in Bronx County when the action was commenced. Plaintiff submitted the police accident report, listing defendant’s address before she moved; an affidavit [462]*462identifying defendant’s former husband as the person on whom process was served; and records of defendant’s voter registration in 2000, none of which is probative of defendant’s residence when the action was commenced (see e.g. Hernandez at 260).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Saxe, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), entered February 17, 2011, which, in an action for personal injuries arising out of a motor vehicle accident, granted defendant’s motion to change venue from Bronx County to Westchester County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant showed that the venue chosen by plaintiff was improper since none of the parties resided in Bronx County when the action was commenced (see Hernandez v Seminatore, 48 AD3d 260 [2008]; CPLR 503 [a]; 510 [1]). Defendant submitted, inter alia, the records of the Department of Motor Vehicles showing that she resided in Westchester County when the action was commenced and her affidavit stating that she exclusively lived in Westchester County at that time (see Weiss v WalMart Stores E., L.P., 83 AD3d 461 [2011]).

In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact as to whether defendant resided in Bronx County when the action was commenced. Plaintiff submitted the police accident report, listing defendant’s address before she moved; an affidavit [462]*462identifying defendant’s former husband as the person on whom process was served; and records of defendant’s voter registration in 2000, none of which is probative of defendant’s residence when the action was commenced (see e.g. Hernandez at 260).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Saxe, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 A.D.3d 461, 942 N.Y.S.2d 870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christomanos-v-vick-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack