Christofield v. Street & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Christofield v. Street & Co.

91 S.E. 513, 19 Ga. App. 412, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 132

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 16, 1917

Docket7698

StatusPublished

This text of 91 S.E. 513 (Christofield v. Street & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Christofield v. Street & Co., 91 S.E. 513, 19 Ga. App. 412, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 132 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

The clerk having informed the court, upon the call of this ease, that the costs had not been paid, and the case having been submitted upon briefs, subject to the condition that the costs be paid within ten days, and it appearing that they have not been paid, the writ of error is, in accordance with rule 17 of this court, dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed,

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins, J.

The clerk having informed the court, upon the call of this ease, that the costs had not been paid, and the case having been submitted upon briefs, subject to the condition that the costs be paid within ten days, and it appearing that they have not been paid, the writ of error is, in accordance with rule 17 of this court, dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed,

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 S.E. 513, 19 Ga. App. 412, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christofield-v-street-co-gactapp-1917.