Christoff v. A. E. Petrossi, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Christoff v. A. E. Petrossi, Inc.

11 A.D.2d 624, 200 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10215

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 5, 1960·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: The cause of action alleged in the complaint is one for breach of a contractual duty, independent of any negligence. Plaintiff claims to be a third-party beneficiary to this contract and a sufficient cause of action is stated in the complaint. (Wilson v. Costich Co., 231 App. Div. 346; Coley v. Cohen, 289 N. Y. 365.) The six-year Statute of Limitations applies. (Blessington V. McCrory Stores Corp., 305 N. Y. 140.) (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpem and McClusky, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: The cause of action alleged in the complaint is one for breach of a contractual duty, independent of any negligence. Plaintiff claims to be a third-party beneficiary to this contract and a sufficient cause of action is stated in the complaint. (Wilson v. Costich Co., 231 App. Div. 346; Coley v. Cohen, 289 N. Y. 365.) The six-year Statute of Limitations applies. (Blessington V. McCrory Stores Corp., 305 N. Y. 140.) (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpem and McClusky, JJ.

Christoff v. A. E. Petrossi, Inc., 11 A.D.2d 624, 200 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10215 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

11 A.D.2d 624 (Christoff v. A. E. Petrossi, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related