Christmas v. State
This text of Christmas v. State (Christmas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
David C. Christmas, Respondent,
v.
State of South Carolina, Petitioner.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Appeal From Florence County
Paul M. Burch, Trial Judge
B. Hicks Harwell, Jr., Post-Conviction Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2004-MO-071
Submitted November 4, 2004 Filed December 13, 2004
VACATED
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley Elliott, Assistant Attorney General Julie M. Thames, all of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Respondent was granted post-conviction relief (PCR) by the PCR court. After careful review of the Appendix and the briefs, we vacate the grant of PCR. See Al-Shabazz v. State of South Carolina, 338 S.C. 354, 527 S.E.2d 742 (2000); Cooper v. State of South Carolina, 338 S.C. 202, 525 S.E.2d 886 (2000).
VACATED.
TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, BURNETT and PLEICONES, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Christmas v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christmas-v-state-sc-2004.