Christman v. Warden

150 A.2d 249, 219 Md. 693, 1959 Md. LEXIS 406
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided April 17, 1959·No. P. C. No. 8·Published

Opinion

PER Curiam.

The State concedes that, assuming the application to have been filed in time, the case must be remanded because of the failure of the trial court to appoint counsel for the defendant as a'n indigent person. Byrd v. Warden, 219 Md. 681, 147 A. 2d 701; Sutton v. Warden, 219 Md. 687, 149 A. 2d 375. We think the application was timely.

Application for leave to appeal granted and case remanded "for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christman v. Warden, 150 A.2d 249, 219 Md. 693, 1959 Md. LEXIS 406 (Md. 1959).

150 A.2d 249 (Christman v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Byrd v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
147 A.2d 701 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Sutton v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
149 A.2d 375 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)