Christman v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Christman v. Warden

150 A.2d 249, 219 Md. 693, 1959 Md. LEXIS 406

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedApril 17, 1959

DocketP. C. No. 8

StatusPublished

This text of 150 A.2d 249 (Christman v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Christman v. Warden, 150 A.2d 249, 219 Md. 693, 1959 Md. LEXIS 406 (Md. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER Curiam.

The State concedes that, assuming the application to have been filed in time, the case must be remanded because of the failure of the trial court to appoint counsel for the defendant as a'n indigent person. Byrd v. Warden, 219 Md. 681, 147 A. 2d 701; Sutton v. Warden, 219 Md. 687, 149 A. 2d 375. We think the application was timely.

Application for leave to appeal granted and case remanded "for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER Curiam.

The State concedes that, assuming the application to have been filed in time, the case must be remanded because of the failure of the trial court to appoint counsel for the defendant as a'n indigent person. Byrd v. Warden, 219 Md. 681, 147 A. 2d 701; Sutton v. Warden, 219 Md. 687, 149 A. 2d 375. We think the application was timely.

Application for leave to appeal granted and case remanded "for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 A.2d 249, 219 Md. 693, 1959 Md. LEXIS 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christman-v-warden-md-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack