Christman v. The State of Nevada

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided July 14, 2025·No. 2:23-cv-01695·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 Mia Christman, Case No.: 2:23-cv-01695-GMN-NJK 6 Petitioner, Order v. State of Nevada, et al., 9 Respondents. 10 This habeas matter is before the Court on Petitioner Mia Christman’s Motion to Seal 11] (“Motion”) (ECF No. 21). Petitioner seeks leave to seal Nicole Anders Affidavit, Exhibit A; 12|| DFS Records, Exhibit B. Exhibit A contains sensitive medical findings. The need to protect 13]| medical privacy generally qualifies as a “compelling reason” for sealing records. E.g., Abbey v. 14|| Hawaii Employers Mut. Ins. Co. (HEMIC), 760 F.Supp.2d 1005, 1013 (D. Haw. 2010). Exhibit 15|| B contains sensitive juvenile records. 16 Having reviewed and considered the matter in accordance with Kamakana v. City and 17|| County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006), and its progeny, the Court finds that a 18]| compelling need to protect Petitioner’s medical privacy outweighs the public interest in open 19]| access to court records. Accordingly, Petitioner’s Motion (ECF No. 21) is granted, and Exhibits A and B (ECF Nos. 22-1, 22-2) are considered properly filed under seal. 21 DATED: July 14, 2025 Vf, 22 4 A 23 GLOR i . NAVARRO UNITEDSTATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christman v. The State of Nevada, (D. Nev. 2025).

Christman v. The State of Nevada (Christman v. The State of Nevada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Abbey v. HAWAII EMPLOYERS MUT. INS. CO.(HEMIC)
760 F. Supp. 2d 1005 (D. Hawaii, 2011)
Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)