Christman v. Introne
This text of 96 A.D.2d 1149 (Christman v. Introne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: As a probationary employee, petitioner has no property interest which would entitle him to a hearing prior to termination (Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564, 569; Matter of Anonymous v Codd, 40 NY2d 860; Matter of Talamo v Murphy, 38 NY2d 637; Ranks v Blum, 96 AD2d 1144; Matter of Salvatore v Nasser, 81 AD2d 1012). Special Term erred, therefore, by directing that respondent prove specific charges of wrongdoing before an arbitrator. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, J. O’C. Conway, J. — art 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Green and Moule, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 A.D.2d 1149, 467 N.Y.S.2d 461, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christman-v-introne-nyappdiv-1983.