Christman v. Introne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Christman v. Introne

96 A.D.2d 1149, 467 N.Y.S.2d 461, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19846

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 23, 1983·Published

Opinion

— Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: As a probationary employee, petitioner has no property interest which would entitle him to a hearing prior to termination (Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564, 569; Matter of Anonymous v Codd, 40 NY2d 860; Matter of Talamo v Murphy, 38 NY2d 637; Ranks v Blum, 96 AD2d 1144; Matter of Salvatore v Nasser, 81 AD2d 1012). Special Term erred, therefore, by directing that respondent prove specific charges of wrongdoing before an arbitrator. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, J. O’C. Conway, J. — art 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Green and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: As a probationary employee, petitioner has no property interest which would entitle him to a hearing prior to termination (Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564, 569; Matter of Anonymous v Codd, 40 NY2d 860; Matter of Talamo v Murphy, 38 NY2d 637; Ranks v Blum, 96 AD2d 1144; Matter of Salvatore v Nasser, 81 AD2d 1012). Special Term erred, therefore, by directing that respondent prove specific charges of wrongdoing before an arbitrator. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, J. O’C. Conway, J. — art 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Green and Moule, JJ.

Christman v. Introne, 96 A.D.2d 1149, 467 N.Y.S.2d 461, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19846 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

96 A.D.2d 1149 (Christman v. Introne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related