Christine Willis v. James Arthur Montgomery

Fourth Circuit

Christine Willis v. James Arthur Montgomery

473 F.2d 1048, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11639

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 13, 1973

Docket72-1658

StatusPublished

This text of 473 F.2d 1048 (Christine Willis v. James Arthur Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Christine Willis v. James Arthur Montgomery, 473 F.2d 1048, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11639 (4th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff Willis recovered damages, in the District Court on April 10, 1972, for personal injuries . received when the automobile in which she was a passenger collided with defendant-appellant’s automobile then bogged down and stopped in a private driveway adjacent to a Virginia State highway. Defendant had attempted to turn his vehicle around by backing into the driveway from the highway. The front of the mired vehicle protruded into the highway lane along which plaintiff was travelling.

Upon consideration of the record and the arguments of counsel on the appeal of the defendants, we find no inadequacy in the evidence or error at trial warranting reversal of the judgment entered for the plaintiff on the jury’s verdict.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff Willis recovered damages, in the District Court on April 10, 1972, for personal injuries . received when the automobile in which she was a passenger collided with defendant-appellant’s automobile then bogged down and stopped in a private driveway adjacent to a Virginia State highway. Defendant had attempted to turn his vehicle around by backing into the driveway from the highway. The front of the mired vehicle protruded into the highway lane along which plaintiff was travelling.

Upon consideration of the record and the arguments of counsel on the appeal of the defendants, we find no inadequacy in the evidence or error at trial warranting reversal of the judgment entered for the plaintiff on the jury’s verdict.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

473 F.2d 1048, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christine-willis-v-james-arthur-montgomery-ca4-1973.