Christine Romano Robbins v. Robert Robbins

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 12, 2000
Docket13-00-00559-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Christine Romano Robbins v. Robert Robbins (Christine Romano Robbins v. Robert Robbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christine Romano Robbins v. Robert Robbins, (Tex. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-00-559-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI

___________________________________________________________________

CHRISTINE ROMANO ROBBINS

, Appellant,

v.


ROBERT ROBBINS

, Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 36th District Court
of San Patricio County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N


Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Chavez

Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, CHRISTINE ROMANO ROBBINS, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 36th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas, in cause number S-97-5250FL-A. The order in this cause was signed on August 31, 1998. No timely motion for new trial was filed. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant's notice of appeal was due on September 30, 1998, but was not filed until on or about November 20, 1999.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the appeal would be dismissed. On September 18, 2000, appellant filed an untimely motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal. A second motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal was untimely filed on September 25, 2000.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to timely perfect her appeal, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant's untimely motions for extension of time to file notice of appeal are DENIED. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 12th day of October, 2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christine Romano Robbins v. Robert Robbins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christine-romano-robbins-v-robert-robbins-texapp-2000.