Christine Rhayanna Allemand v. The State of Wyoming
This text of 2026 WY 9 (Christine Rhayanna Allemand v. The State of Wyoming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING
2026 WY 9
October Term, A.D. 2025
January 22, 2026
CHRISTINE RHAYANNA ALLEMAND,
Appellant (Defendant), S-25-0233 v.
THE STATE OF WYOMING,
Appellee (Plaintiff).
ORDER AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT’S JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE [¶1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that Appellant has filed a pro se brief in the time allotted. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Appellant entered an unconditional guilty plea to one felony count of possession of a controlled substance – methamphetamine, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 35-7-1031(c)(ii). For this count, the district court imposed a 2 to 4-year sentence of incarceration suspended in favor of 3 years of supervised probation. Appellant filed this appeal to challenge the district court’s August 6, 2025, Judgment and Sentence.
[¶2] On November 17, 2025, Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel filed a Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). This Court subsequently entered an Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Pro Se Brief. This Court ordered that Appellant was permitted to file with this Court a pro se brief specifying the issues she would like the Court to consider in this appeal. This Court also provided notice that, after the time for filing a pro se brief expired, this Court would make its ruling on counsel’s motion to withdraw and, if appropriate, make a final decision on this appeal. Appellant filed a pro se brief in the time allotted. [¶3] Now, following a careful review of the Anders brief submitted by appellate counsel, Appellant’s pro se brief, and the record, this Court finds that appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw should be granted and the district court’s Judgment and Sentence, should be affirmed. It is, therefore,
[¶4] ORDERED that the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office, court-appointed counsel for Appellant Christine Rhayanna Allemand, is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel of record for Appellant; and it is further
[¶5] ORDERED that the Natrona County District Court’s August 6, 2025, Judgment and Sentence be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.
[¶6] DATED this 22nd day of January, 2026.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
LYNNE BOOMGAARDEN Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2026 WY 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christine-rhayanna-allemand-v-the-state-of-wyoming-wyo-2026.