Christine Lockette v. Dr. Miracle LLC
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
No. 12-2123
Christine M. Lockette
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Dr. Miracle LLC; Solo Laboratories Inc.; King Beauty Distributor Corporation
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
Sarah Cho
lllllllllllllllllllllMovant - Appellee
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
Submitted: October 5, 2012 Filed: October 11, 2012
[Unpublished]
Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Christine Lockette appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing her complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Upon careful de novo review, see Knutson v. City of Fargo, 600 F.3d 992, 995 (8th Cir. 2010) (dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction reviewed de novo), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
1 The Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Christine Lockette v. Dr. Miracle LLC (Christine Lockette v. Dr. Miracle LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.