Christine Lockette v. Dr. Miracle LLC
This text of Christine Lockette v. Dr. Miracle LLC (Christine Lockette v. Dr. Miracle LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 12-2123 ___________________________
Christine M. Lockette
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Dr. Miracle LLC; Solo Laboratories Inc.; King Beauty Distributor Corporation
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
Sarah Cho
lllllllllllllllllllllMovant - Appellee ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________
Submitted: October 5, 2012 Filed: October 11, 2012 [Unpublished] ____________
Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM. Christine Lockette appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing her complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Upon careful de novo review, see Knutson v. City of Fargo, 600 F.3d 992, 995 (8th Cir. 2010) (dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction reviewed de novo), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Christine Lockette v. Dr. Miracle LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christine-lockette-v-dr-miracle-llc-ca8-2012.