Christine Brown v. Carolyn Colvin
This text of 669 F. App'x 318 (Christine Brown v. Carolyn Colvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Christine Brown appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. We disagree with Mrs. Brown that the administrative law judge (ALJ) did not adequately account for her mental impairments in determining her residual functional capacity (RFC), see Buford v. Colvin, 824 F.3d 793, 796 (8th Cir. 2016) (it is claimant’s burden to establish RFC); and we conclude that substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the ALJ’s adverse decision, see Ash v. Colvin, 812 F.3d 686, 689-90 (8th Cir. 2016) (substantial evidence is enough that reasonable minds would find it adequate). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
669 F. App'x 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christine-brown-v-carolyn-colvin-ca8-2016.