Christine Brown v. Carolyn Colvin

669 F. App'x 318
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 23, 2016
Docket16-1235
StatusUnpublished

This text of 669 F. App'x 318 (Christine Brown v. Carolyn Colvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christine Brown v. Carolyn Colvin, 669 F. App'x 318 (8th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Christine Brown appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. We disagree with Mrs. Brown that the administrative law judge (ALJ) did not adequately account for her mental impairments in determining her residual functional capacity (RFC), see Buford v. Colvin, 824 F.3d 793, 796 (8th Cir. 2016) (it is claimant’s burden to establish RFC); and we conclude that substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the ALJ’s adverse decision, see Ash v. Colvin, 812 F.3d 686, 689-90 (8th Cir. 2016) (substantial evidence is enough that reasonable minds would find it adequate). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable Erin Setser, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Karen Ash v. Carolyn W. Colvin
812 F.3d 686 (Eighth Circuit, 2016)
Samuel Buford v. Carolyn W. Colvin
824 F.3d 793 (Eighth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
669 F. App'x 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christine-brown-v-carolyn-colvin-ca8-2016.