Christina Thompson v. the State of Texas
This text of Christina Thompson v. the State of Texas (Christina Thompson v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-25-00265-CR
Christina Thompson, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE COMAL COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF COMAL COUNTY NO. 2023CR0771, THE HONORABLE DEBORAH WIGINGTON, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Pending before this Court are two motions: appointed appellate counsel’s motion
to withdraw, asserting that she has not been able to contact appellant since October 2025, and
appellant’s third motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief. Appellant, although
declared indigent for purposes of appellate counsel, was apparently found not indigent for
purposes of the reporter’s record. See McFatridge v. State, 309 S.W.3d 1, 6 (Tex. Crim. App.
2010) (“A defendant can be found indigent for one purpose without being found indigent for the
other.”). Appellant has not paid for the reporter’s record even after three extensions of time to
pay for it granted by this Court. Appellant’s indigency status is unclear; appellant has
recognized in prior pleadings that the trial court found her not indigent for purposes of the
reporter’s record, but the record does not contain evidence supporting that non-indigence
determination. See id. (“After a defendant establishes a prima facie showing of indigency, ‘an appellate court can uphold a trial court’s determination of non-indigence only if the record
contains evidence supporting such a determination.’”).
The appeal is abated and remanded to the trial court. The trial court shall conduct
a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and, if so, whether
appellant is indigent. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3, 38.8. The court shall make appropriate written
findings and recommendations. If necessary, the court shall appoint substitute counsel who will
effectively represent appellant in this appeal. Following the hearing, which shall be transcribed,
the trial court shall order the appropriate supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records—including
all findings and orders—to be prepared and forwarded to this Court no later than April 27, 2026.
See id. R. 38.8(b)(3).
It is so ordered March 13, 2026.
Before Justices Triana, Kelly, and Ellis
Abated and Remanded
Filed: March 13, 2026
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Christina Thompson v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christina-thompson-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp3-2026.