Christina Marie Evers v. Yolanda Johnson

• Court: District Court, E.D. California
• Decided: September 10, 2025
• Docket: 2:25-cv-02093
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTINA MARIE EVERS, No. 2:25-cv-2093-TLN-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 YOLANDA JOHNSON, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Christina Marie Evers (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled 18 action along with a motion for temporary restraining order on July 28, 2025. (ECF Nos. 1, 3.) 19 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 20 On July 30, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 21 served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within 21 days. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff did not file objections 23 to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007). The Court has reviewed the file and finds 27 the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s 28 analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 30, 2025 (ECF No. 4) are ADOPTED in 3 full; 4 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order (ECF No. 3) is DENIED; 5 3. The complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED for lack of federal jurisdiction; and 6 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. 7 Date: September 9, 2025

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28