Christina De La Torre v. AAG Properties, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 3, 2015
Docket14-15-00856-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Christina De La Torre v. AAG Properties, Inc. (Christina De La Torre v. AAG Properties, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christina De La Torre v. AAG Properties, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 3, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00856-CV

CHRISTINA DE LA TORRE, Appellant

V.

AAG PROPERTIES, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 125th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014-05829

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from the denial of a motion for summary judgment. Absent certain exceptions that do not apply here, an appellate court does not have jurisdiction to hear denied motions for summary judgment on appeal. Ackermann v. Vordenbaum, 403 S.W.2d 362, 365 (Tex.1966); William Marsh Rice Univ. v. Coleman, 291 S.W.3d 43, 45 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2009, pet. dism’d). On November 18, 2015, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal on or before November 30, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). On November 19, 2015 appellant filed a response asking this court to consolidate this appeal with a petition for permissive appeal challenging the same order. Appellant’s response alleges that the notice of appeal in this cause number was inadvertently filed. Appellant’s response fails to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction over this appeal. The court will consider the record filed in this interlocutory appeal when reviewing appellant’s petition for permissive appeal.

Accordingly, appellant’s motion to consolidate is denied and the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Brown.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

William Marsh Rice University v. Coleman
291 S.W.3d 43 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009)
Ackermann v. Vordenbaum
403 S.W.2d 362 (Texas Supreme Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christina De La Torre v. AAG Properties, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christina-de-la-torre-v-aag-properties-inc-texapp-2015.