CHRISTINA CORONA, Individually and as Natural Guardian of J. C. v. AVE MARIA PARISH, INC. D/B/A DONAHUE ACADEMY OF AVE MARIA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 8, 2026
Docket6D2026-0710
StatusPublished

This text of CHRISTINA CORONA, Individually and as Natural Guardian of J. C. v. AVE MARIA PARISH, INC. D/B/A DONAHUE ACADEMY OF AVE MARIA (CHRISTINA CORONA, Individually and as Natural Guardian of J. C. v. AVE MARIA PARISH, INC. D/B/A DONAHUE ACADEMY OF AVE MARIA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
CHRISTINA CORONA, Individually and as Natural Guardian of J. C. v. AVE MARIA PARISH, INC. D/B/A DONAHUE ACADEMY OF AVE MARIA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

Case No. 6D2026-0710 Lower Tribunal No. 2026-CA-0000610 _____________________________

CHRISTINA CORONA, individually and as Natural Guardian of J.C., a minor,

Appellant,

v.

AVE MARIA PARISH, INC., d/b/a DONAHUE ACADEMY OF AVE MARIA,

Appellee. _____________________________

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Collier County. Ramiro Mañalich, Judge.

April 8, 2026

MIZE, J.

Appellant, Christina Corona, appeals the trial court’s order on her

Emergency Motion for Temporary Injunction. 1 Appellant asserts that the trial

court erred by denying the motion and also by denying the motion without first

conducting a hearing on the motion. However, the trial court’s order makes clear

that the trial court only denied Appellant’s motion to the extent the motion sought

a temporary injunction without notice to Appellee. The trial court’s order did not

1 We have jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(B). deny the motion without permitting a hearing on the motion. On the contrary, the

trial court’s order explicitly stated that Appellant was permitted to schedule a

hearing on the motion once service of process had been effectuated on Appellee.

Because we find no error in the trial court’s denial of the motion to the extent it

sought a temporary injunction without notice to Appellee, we affirm the trial

court’s order. This affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant scheduling a

hearing on the motion after providing notice to Appellee, which the trial court’s

order explicitly permitted.

AFFIRMED.

NARDELLA and GANNAM, JJ., concur.

Raymond Christopher and David Asti, of Ave Maria Law Center, Ave Maria, for Appellant.

Brendan J. Shearman, of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
CHRISTINA CORONA, Individually and as Natural Guardian of J. C. v. AVE MARIA PARISH, INC. D/B/A DONAHUE ACADEMY OF AVE MARIA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christina-corona-individually-and-as-natural-guardian-of-j-c-v-ave-fladistctapp-2026.