CHRISTINA CORONA, Individually and as Natural Guardian of J. C. v. AVE MARIA PARISH, INC. D/B/A DONAHUE ACADEMY OF AVE MARIA
This text of CHRISTINA CORONA, Individually and as Natural Guardian of J. C. v. AVE MARIA PARISH, INC. D/B/A DONAHUE ACADEMY OF AVE MARIA (CHRISTINA CORONA, Individually and as Natural Guardian of J. C. v. AVE MARIA PARISH, INC. D/B/A DONAHUE ACADEMY OF AVE MARIA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 6D2026-0710 Lower Tribunal No. 2026-CA-0000610 _____________________________
CHRISTINA CORONA, individually and as Natural Guardian of J.C., a minor,
Appellant,
v.
AVE MARIA PARISH, INC., d/b/a DONAHUE ACADEMY OF AVE MARIA,
Appellee. _____________________________
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Collier County. Ramiro Mañalich, Judge.
April 8, 2026
MIZE, J.
Appellant, Christina Corona, appeals the trial court’s order on her
Emergency Motion for Temporary Injunction. 1 Appellant asserts that the trial
court erred by denying the motion and also by denying the motion without first
conducting a hearing on the motion. However, the trial court’s order makes clear
that the trial court only denied Appellant’s motion to the extent the motion sought
a temporary injunction without notice to Appellee. The trial court’s order did not
1 We have jurisdiction. Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(B). deny the motion without permitting a hearing on the motion. On the contrary, the
trial court’s order explicitly stated that Appellant was permitted to schedule a
hearing on the motion once service of process had been effectuated on Appellee.
Because we find no error in the trial court’s denial of the motion to the extent it
sought a temporary injunction without notice to Appellee, we affirm the trial
court’s order. This affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant scheduling a
hearing on the motion after providing notice to Appellee, which the trial court’s
order explicitly permitted.
AFFIRMED.
NARDELLA and GANNAM, JJ., concur.
Raymond Christopher and David Asti, of Ave Maria Law Center, Ave Maria, for Appellant.
Brendan J. Shearman, of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
CHRISTINA CORONA, Individually and as Natural Guardian of J. C. v. AVE MARIA PARISH, INC. D/B/A DONAHUE ACADEMY OF AVE MARIA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christina-corona-individually-and-as-natural-guardian-of-j-c-v-ave-fladistctapp-2026.