Christina Caroline Lukasik v. Jacqueline L. Portz

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 26, 1997
Docket03-97-00083-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Christina Caroline Lukasik v. Jacqueline L. Portz (Christina Caroline Lukasik v. Jacqueline L. Portz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christina Caroline Lukasik v. Jacqueline L. Portz, (Tex. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN




NO. 03-97-00083-CV

Christina Caroline Lukasik, Appellant


v.



Jacqueline L. Portz, Appellee



FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF COMAL COUNTY

NO. 96CV-261, HONORABLE FRED CLARK, JUDGE PRESIDING

PER CURIAM

Appellant Christina Caroline Lukasik appeals from a judgment of the trial court in favor of appellee Jacqueline L. Portz. Because appellant has failed to file a brief, we will dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

The Clerk of this Court filed the transcript on February 13, 1997. Accordingly, appellant's brief was due on March 17, 1997. See Tex. R. App. P. 74(k).

By letter dated April 23, 1997, the Clerk of this Court notified the parties that appellant's brief was overdue and that the appeal was subject to dismissal unless appellant tendered a motion by May 5, 1997, reasonably explaining her failure to file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 74(l)(1); see Tex. R. App. P. 60(a)(2). Thus far, appellant has submitted neither a brief nor a motion for an extension of time to file a brief.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution on our own motion. Tex. R. App. P. 60(a)(1), 74(l)(1); Sentinel Pipe Servs., Inc. v. Tandy Computer Leasing, 825 S.W.2d 212 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 1992, no writ); Dickson v. Dickson, 541 S.W.2d 895, 896 (Tex. Civ. App.--Austin 1976, writ dism'd w.o.j.).



Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Aboussie and B. A. Smith

Appeal Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: June 26, 1997

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dickson v. Dickson
541 S.W.2d 895 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)
Sentinel Pipe Services, Inc. v. Tandy Computer Leasing
825 S.W.2d 212 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christina Caroline Lukasik v. Jacqueline L. Portz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christina-caroline-lukasik-v-jacqueline-l-portz-texapp-1997.