Christie v. Hixson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Christie v. Hixson

358 So. 2d 859, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15575

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 16, 1978·No. No. 77-761·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the record and briefs of counsel for the respective parties, [860]*860we determine the trial court erred in sustaining objections to interrogatories and in entering a protective order as the objections were non-specific and insufficient. Carson v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 173 So.2d 743 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965). Accordingly, the order appealed bearing date March 28, 1977 is reversed and the cause remanded with directions that the interrogatories be answered.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

DOWNEY, C. J., and CROSS and MOORE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the record and briefs of counsel for the respective parties, [860]*860we determine the trial court erred in sustaining objections to interrogatories and in entering a protective order as the objections were non-specific and insufficient. Carson v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 173 So.2d 743 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965). Accordingly, the order appealed bearing date March 28, 1977 is reversed and the cause remanded with directions that the interrogatories be answered.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

DOWNEY, C. J., and CROSS and MOORE, JJ., concur.

Christie v. Hixson, 358 So. 2d 859, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15575 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

358 So. 2d 859 (Christie v. Hixson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related