Christie v. Cornelius Callahan Co.

New York Supreme Court

Christie v. Cornelius Callahan Co.

22 N.Y.S. 37, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 413

DecidedFebruary 13, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 22 N.Y.S. 37 (Christie v. Cornelius Callahan Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Christie v. Cornelius Callahan Co., 22 N.Y.S. 37, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 413 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

PRATT, J.

So far as we can see, the referee’s decision in this case was based upon sufficient evidence, after he had carefulh'- weighed seriously conflicting testimony. We, therefore, decline to interfere in that aspect of the case. If the contract was made in Massachusetts on Sunday, it is quite evident that defendant induced plaintiff to perform it in pretty much all the rest of the United States on Monday, and every other week day, until it had obtained all the benefit therefrom which plaintiff was able to give.

We affirm the judgment, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRATT, J.

So far as we can see, the referee’s decision in this case was based upon sufficient evidence, after he had carefulh'- weighed seriously conflicting testimony. We, therefore, decline to interfere in that aspect of the case. If the contract was made in Massachusetts on Sunday, it is quite evident that defendant induced plaintiff to perform it in pretty much all the rest of the United States on Monday, and every other week day, until it had obtained all the benefit therefrom which plaintiff was able to give.

We affirm the judgment, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 N.Y.S. 37, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christie-v-cornelius-callahan-co-nysupct-1893.