Christie v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
MARY CHRISTIE,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 6:24-cv-1167-RBD-SJH
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant. ____________________________________
ORDER On referral in this Social Security appeal, U.S. Magistrate Judge Samuel J. Horovitz entered a Report and Recommendation that the Court should affirm the Commissioner’s decision. (Doc. 21 (“R&R”).) The time has passed, and the parties did not object, so the Court examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The R&R (Doc. 21) is ADOPTED AND CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order in its entirety. 2. The Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. 3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff and then to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on February 10, 2025.
i | ROY B. DALTON, JR. - United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Christie v. Commissioner of Social Security (Christie v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.