Christie v. Broussard
This text of 308 U.S. 514 (Christie v. Broussard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motion to dismiss! is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. McGrew, 188 U. S. 291, 308; Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Home for Incurables v. City of New York, 187 U. S. 155, 158; (2) Roberts v. City of New York, 295 U. S. 264, 278; Seattle Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 U. S. 568, 570; Cross Lake Shooting & Fishing Club v. Louisiana, 224 U. S. 632, 638; Ross v. Oregon, 227 U. S. 150, 162.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
308 U.S. 514, 60 S. Ct. 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christie-v-broussard-scotus-1939.