Christie & Sons v. Moore
This text of 172 S.E. 721 (Christie & Sons v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case, in which an $18 judgment was rendered against the defendants in an action of bail-trover involving some barrow hogs and pigs, the defendants’ motion for a new trial, the denial of which is the error assigned, contains only the general grounds. The evidence being in conflict as to whether the plaintiff’s son as her authorized agent delivered the property to the defendants in partial payment of the son’s mortgage indebtedness to them, the court did not err in denying a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
172 S.E. 721, 48 Ga. App. 373, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christie-sons-v-moore-gactapp-1934.