Christian William Pfister v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 2, 2021·No. 04-21-00072-CR·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 2, 2021

No. 04-21-00072-CR

Christian William PFISTER, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the County Court At Law No 2, Guadalupe County, Texas Trial Court No. CCL-20-0273 Honorable Frank Follis, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On June 30, 2021, this court’s opinion dismissing this appeal issued. On July 14, 2021, appellant filed a pro se motion to reinstate the case. Appellant is represented by Susan Schoon. In Texas, appellants do not have a right to hybrid representation. Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981). Therefore, appellant’s motion is DENIED.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 2nd day of September, 2021.

___________________________________ Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christian William Pfister v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Christian William Pfister v. the State of Texas (Christian William Pfister v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rudd v. State
616 S.W.2d 623 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)