Christian v. Wright

470 F. App'x 212
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 3, 2012·No. No. 11-7602·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kelvin Christian appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Christian v. Wright, No. 1:11-cv-01163LO-JFA (E.D.Va. Nov. 9, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christian v. Wright, 470 F. App'x 212 (4th Cir. 2012).

470 F. App'x 212 (Christian v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l)