Christian v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Christian v. State

1972 OK CR 84, 495 P.2d 415, 1972 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 464

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 15, 1972

DocketNo. A-17049

StatusPublished

This text of 1972 OK CR 84 (Christian v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Christian v. State, 1972 OK CR 84, 495 P.2d 415, 1972 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 464 (Okla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TO DISMISS

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge:

This is an attempt to appeal from a conviction for the crime of Robbery with a Dangerous Weapon, in which plaintiff in error, Jimmy Lee Christian, was found guilty and sentenced in the District Court of Bryan County, Oklahoma, to serve ten (10) years in the state penitentiary. After reviewing the purported Transcript of the Record, we failed to find the copy of the judgment and sentence entered by the District Court. This Court has long held that where the Transcript fails to contain the final judgment sought to be reversed, the Court of Criminal Appeals has no jurisdiction to consider the appeal. See Murray v. State, Okl.Cr., 448 P.2d 473; Sprouse v. State, Okl.Cr., 432 P.2d 664; Stanton v. State, 23 Okl.Cr. 193, 213 P. 914, and cases cited.

It is therefore the order of the Court that the attempted appeal herein shall be dismissed.

SIMMS, J., concurs. BRETT, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TO DISMISS

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge:

This is an attempt to appeal from a conviction for the crime of Robbery with a Dangerous Weapon, in which plaintiff in error, Jimmy Lee Christian, was found guilty and sentenced in the District Court of Bryan County, Oklahoma, to serve ten (10) years in the state penitentiary. After reviewing the purported Transcript of the Record, we failed to find the copy of the judgment and sentence entered by the District Court. This Court has long held that where the Transcript fails to contain the final judgment sought to be reversed, the Court of Criminal Appeals has no jurisdiction to consider the appeal. See Murray v. State, Okl.Cr., 448 P.2d 473; Sprouse v. State, Okl.Cr., 432 P.2d 664; Stanton v. State, 23 Okl.Cr. 193, 213 P. 914, and cases cited.

It is therefore the order of the Court that the attempted appeal herein shall be dismissed.

SIMMS, J., concurs. BRETT, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1972 OK CR 84, 495 P.2d 415, 1972 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christian-v-state-oklacrimapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack