Christian v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Christian v. State

265 So. 2d 83, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6380

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 18, 1972

DocketNo. 72-251

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 265 So. 2d 83 (Christian v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Christian v. State, 265 So. 2d 83, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6380 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellants were charged and convicted of possession of marijuana, for which they were sentenced to confinement in the county jail for a period of thirty days, and placed on probation for a year. They were arrested for soliciting a ride on a public roadway. In their possession were two back packs and a pillow case. Inventory search thereof at the police station revealed the marijuana in the pillow case. Both defendants admitted ownership of the contents of the pillow case, including the marijuana.

Appellants contend the trial court erred in denying their motion to suppress such evidence; in admitting their inculpa-tory statements; and that the evidence was insufficient to prove the allegation of their possession of the marijuana. Upon consideration thereof in the light of the record and briefs we hold those contentions are without merit. The motion to suppress was properly denied. State v. Gustafson, Fla.1972, 258 So.2d 1. The defendants’ admission of ownership of the marijuana was made following due information as to their rights, in accordance with the Miranda decision. No objection was made in the trial court, on constitutional grounds, to the admission thereof. The evidence of possession was sufficient.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellants were charged and convicted of possession of marijuana, for which they were sentenced to confinement in the county jail for a period of thirty days, and placed on probation for a year. They were arrested for soliciting a ride on a public roadway. In their possession were two back packs and a pillow case. Inventory search thereof at the police station revealed the marijuana in the pillow case. Both defendants admitted ownership of the contents of the pillow case, including the marijuana.

Appellants contend the trial court erred in denying their motion to suppress such evidence; in admitting their inculpa-tory statements; and that the evidence was insufficient to prove the allegation of their possession of the marijuana. Upon consideration thereof in the light of the record and briefs we hold those contentions are without merit. The motion to suppress was properly denied. State v. Gustafson, Fla.1972, 258 So.2d 1. The defendants’ admission of ownership of the marijuana was made following due information as to their rights, in accordance with the Miranda decision. No objection was made in the trial court, on constitutional grounds, to the admission thereof. The evidence of possession was sufficient.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 So. 2d 83, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christian-v-state-fladistctapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack