Christian v. Poole

284 A.D.2d 759, 726 N.Y.S.2d 592, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6607

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in St. Lawrence County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Following a tier III hearing,* petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting inmates from engaging in unauthorized organizational activities and giving speeches or addresses other than those approved by a Superintendent of a facility. Upon administrative appeal, the charge of engaging in unauthorized organizational activities was dismissed and petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the finding of guilt on the remaining charge. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the misbehavior report, together with the testimony adduced at the hearing, constitute substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964; Matter of Coleman v Harko, 183 AD2d 1016). Petitioner’s differing version of the events created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Collazo v Senkowski, 282 AD2d 851).

We have reviewed petitioner’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are either unpreserved for our review or lacking in merit.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christian v. Poole, 284 A.D.2d 759, 726 N.Y.S.2d 592, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6607 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

284 A.D.2d 759 (Christian v. Poole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foster v. Coughlin
565 N.E.2d 477 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)
Coleman v. Harko
183 A.D.2d 1016 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Collazo v. Senkowski
282 A.D.2d 851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)