Christian v. Matthews

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Christian v. Matthews

98 S.E. 102, 23 Ga. App. 267, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 73

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 15, 1919

Docket9845

StatusPublished

This text of 98 S.E. 102 (Christian v. Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Christian v. Matthews, 98 S.E. 102, 23 Ga. App. 267, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 73 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

The verdict is amply supported by the evidence, and the charge of the court fully and fair-ly covered every issue made by the testimony and the pleadings. The failure to give certain instructions to the jury, as complained of, even had there been a timely request, would not have been error. Hill v. Ludden & Bates, 113 Ga. 320 (3) (38 S. E. 752).

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins, J.

The verdict is amply supported by the evidence, and the charge of the court fully and fair-ly covered every issue made by the testimony and the pleadings. The failure to give certain instructions to the jury, as complained of, even had there been a timely request, would not have been error. Hill v. Ludden & Bates, 113 Ga. 320 (3) (38 S. E. 752).

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 S.E. 102, 23 Ga. App. 267, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christian-v-matthews-gactapp-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack