Christian v. LINCOLN AUTOMOTIVE COMPANY

940 N.E.2d 1159, 239 Ill. 2d 550, 346 Ill. Dec. 555, 2011 Ill. LEXIS 41
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided January 26, 2011·No. 111178·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

940 N.E.2d 1159 (2011)

Frank CHRISTIAN, respondent,
v.
LINCOLN AUTOMOTIVE COMPANY, petitioner.

No. 111178.

Supreme Court of Illinois.

January 26, 2011.

Petition for leave to appeal denied.

In the exercise of this Court's supervisory authority, the Appellate Court, Third District, is directed to vacate that portion of its judgment in Christian v. Lincoln Automotive Co., 403 Ill.App.3d 1038, 343 Ill.Dec. 462, 934 N.E.2d 1065 (2010), addressing the second part of the certified question dealing with whether "the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of diligence pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 103(b)," but only as it pertains to defendant Lincoln Automotive Company. Plaintiff has not sought leave to appeal from the appellate court's judgment. The appellate court is directed to remand the matter to the circuit court to address defendant Lincoln Automotive Company's motion to dismiss under the standards enunciated by the appellate court in resolving the first part of the certified question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christian v. LINCOLN AUTOMOTIVE COMPANY, 940 N.E.2d 1159, 239 Ill. 2d 550, 346 Ill. Dec. 555, 2011 Ill. LEXIS 41 (Ill. 2011).

940 N.E.2d 1159 (Christian v. LINCOLN AUTOMOTIVE COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Villegas
940 N.E.2d 1159 (Illinois Supreme Court, 2011)