Christian v. LINCOLN AUTOMOTIVE COMPANY
This text of 940 N.E.2d 1159 (Christian v. LINCOLN AUTOMOTIVE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Frank CHRISTIAN, respondent,
v.
LINCOLN AUTOMOTIVE COMPANY, petitioner.
Supreme Court of Illinois.
Petition for leave to appeal denied.
In the exercise of this Court's supervisory authority, the Appellate Court, Third District, is directed to vacate that portion of its judgment in Christian v. Lincoln Automotive Co., 403 Ill.App.3d 1038, 343 Ill.Dec. 462, 934 N.E.2d 1065 (2010), addressing the second part of the certified question dealing with whether "the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of diligence pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 103(b)," but only as it pertains to defendant Lincoln Automotive Company. Plaintiff has not sought leave to appeal from the appellate court's judgment. The appellate court is directed to remand the matter to the circuit court to address defendant Lincoln Automotive Company's motion to dismiss under the standards enunciated by the appellate court in resolving the first part of the certified question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
940 N.E.2d 1159, 239 Ill. 2d 550, 346 Ill. Dec. 555, 2011 Ill. LEXIS 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christian-v-lincoln-automotive-company-ill-2011.