Christian v. Hanks
This text of 22 Ga. 125 (Christian v. Hanks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
Drury Christian intermarried with Esther A. Banks in 1855. Before the marriage, they entered into an agreement, that the title of their property should not he changed by the marriage, but that the property of each should remain subject to the debts of the party to Avhom it belonged, which were contracted before the marriage, and that the property of each should be exempt from the debts of the other. Some of the wife’s creditors were proceeding to enforce them against the husband and this bill is filed by the husband to enjoin them. The Court refused to order injunction, and his refusal is assigned as error. This marriage took place prior to the enactment of the statute, which prescribes the liability of parties entering into marriages. The rights of the parties depend, therefore, upon the pre-existing law. By that law, the husband cannot relieve himself from the obligation which a rule of Iuav imposes on him by his marriage. He may stipulate Avith his intended wife for her benefit, but not for his relief against the rights of creditors, Avhere the contract does not extend to a provision for the wife, in consideration of the marriage.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 Ga. 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christian-v-hanks-ga-1857.