Christian v. Goord

244 A.D.2d 675, 665 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11493
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Christian v. Goord. Read the opinion of the Court — 246 A.D.2d 930

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

The Attorney-General has advised this Court by letter that respondent is not submitting a brief and requests that this proceeding be dismissed as moot inasmuch as the determination under review has been administratively reversed and ex-pungement has been directed. Because petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is moot and the petition is dismissed (see, Matter of Martin v Henderson, 159 AD2d 867).

[676]*676Cardona, P. J., White, Casey, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christian v. Goord, 244 A.D.2d 675, 665 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11493 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

244 A.D.2d 675 (Christian v. Goord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. Henderson
159 A.D.2d 867 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)