Christian v. Evans
This text of 5 Or. 253 (Christian v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court,
The views of this Court, in relation to what is required in a notice of appeal, have been expressed in numerous cases, the last two of which are Lewis v. Lewis (4 Or. 209), and Whiteaker v. Vanschoiack.
In actions at law the appellant must also specify the errors upon which he relies in the notice. As the notice in this case is defective in not describing the judgment and naming the parties thereto, it falls within the rule of the cases cited, and the motion to dismiss must prevail.
Appeal dismissed.
The opinion on the motion to dismiss in Whiteaker v. Vanschoiack is not reported. It was rendered at the January Term, 1873.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Or. 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christian-v-evans-or-1874.