Christian v. City of Greenville
This text of Christian v. City of Greenville (Christian v. City of Greenville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1420
GREGORY T. CHRISTIAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CITY OF GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA-01-605-6-25AK)
Submitted: June 12, 2003 Decided: June 17, 2003
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory T. Christian, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Merritt Gantt, HAYNSWORTH SINKLER BOYD, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Gregory T. Christian appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Christian v. City of
Greenville, No. CA-01-605-6-25AK (D.S.C. Mar. 13, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Christian v. City of Greenville, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christian-v-city-of-greenville-ca4-2003.