Christian v. Biden

• Court: District Court, District of Columbia
• Decided: March 18, 2024
• Docket: Civil Action No. 2024-0149
• Status: Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

PATRICK CHRISTIAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 24-0149 (UNA) ) JOSEPH BIDEN, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Under the statute governing in forma pauperis proceedings, the Court is required to

dismiss a case “at any time” it determines that the action is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a

claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Here, having reviewed the

complaint carefully, the Court cannot discern what claim or claims plaintiff intends to bring.

The caption may suggest a civil rights conspiracy claim, yet the few factual allegations set forth

in the complaint fall far short of stating a viable claim, rendering the complaint subject to

dismissal. See McGuire v. U.S. District Court, No. 10-cv-0696, 2010 WL 1855858, at *1

(D.D.C. May 4, 2010) (summarily dismissing complaint under § 1915(e)(2) because it was

“largely incoherent and nonsensical”); cf. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989) (“[A]

complaint, containing . . . factual allegations and legal conclusions . . . lack[ing] an arguable

basis either in law or in fact” shall be dismissed.). As a result, the complaint fails to comply with

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8 and 12(b)(6).

The Court will grant plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the

complaint without prejudice. A separate order will issue.

DATE: March 18, 2024 RANDOLPH D. MOSS United States District Judge