Christian Uskanga-Torres v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 16, 2012
Docket03-12-00106-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Christian Uskanga-Torres v. State (Christian Uskanga-Torres v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christian Uskanga-Torres v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN




NO. 03-12-00106-CR

Christian Uskanga-Torres, Appellant



v.



The State of Texas, Appellee



FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LLANO COUNTY, 424TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR6295, THE HONORABLE DANIEL H. MILLS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N



Appellant, Christian Uskanga-Torres, was convicted by a jury of the first degree felony offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.021(West 2011). The jury assessed his punishment at confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for 20 years and, in addition, assessed a $5,000 fine. See id. § 12.32 (West 2011).

Appellant's court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988). Appellant's counsel sent appellant a copy of the brief along with a letter advising appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766. No pro se brief or other written response has been filed.

We have conducted an independent review of the record and find no reversible error. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the record presents no arguably meritorious grounds for review and the appeal is frivolous. Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.



__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Henson, and Goodwin

Affirmed

Filed: August 16, 2012

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Bledsoe v. State
178 S.W.3d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Garner v. State
300 S.W.3d 763 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christian Uskanga-Torres v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christian-uskanga-torres-v-state-texapp-2012.