CHRISTIAN LOZANO v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and DIANA LOZANO

District Court of Appeal of Florida

CHRISTIAN LOZANO v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and DIANA LOZANO

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 10, 2021

Docket20-0292

StatusPublished

This text of CHRISTIAN LOZANO v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and DIANA LOZANO (CHRISTIAN LOZANO v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and DIANA LOZANO) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

CHRISTIAN LOZANO v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and DIANA LOZANO, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

CHRISTIAN LOZANO, Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and DIANA LOZANO, Appellees.

No. 4D20-292

[February 10, 2021]

Appeal from the State of Florida, Department of Revenue; L.T. Case Nos. 56180003043DR and CSE 2001340734.

Christian Lozano, Port St. Lucie, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee Department of Revenue.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Christian Lozano, appeals pro se the final administrative support order rendered by the appellee, the Department of Revenue. The appellant’s brief does not raise any issue with merit. Thus, we affirm the support order without prejudice for the appellant to seek a modification of the final administrative support order as set forth in section 409.2563(12), Florida Statutes (2020), or a superseding order in the circuit court pursuant to section 409.2563(10)(c), Florida Statutes (2020). See Feliciano v. Dep’t of Revenue, Child Support Enf’t, 305 So. 3d 801, 803 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020).

Affirmed without prejudice.

WARNER, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

CHRISTIAN LOZANO, Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and DIANA LOZANO, Appellees.

No. 4D20-292

[February 10, 2021]

Appeal from the State of Florida, Department of Revenue; L.T. Case Nos. 56180003043DR and CSE 2001340734.

Christian Lozano, Port St. Lucie, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee Department of Revenue.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Christian Lozano, appeals pro se the final administrative support order rendered by the appellee, the Department of Revenue. The appellant’s brief does not raise any issue with merit. Thus, we affirm the support order without prejudice for the appellant to seek a modification of the final administrative support order as set forth in section 409.2563(12), Florida Statutes (2020), or a superseding order in the circuit court pursuant to section 409.2563(10)(c), Florida Statutes (2020). See Feliciano v. Dep’t of Revenue, Child Support Enf’t, 305 So. 3d 801, 803 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020).

Affirmed without prejudice.

WARNER, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

CHRISTIAN LOZANO v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and DIANA LOZANO, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christian-lozano-v-department-of-revenue-child-support-enforcement-and-fladistctapp-2021.