Christian Eliez Ordonez Rugama v. Kristi Noem, et al.

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided December 29, 2025·No. 3:25-cv-00741·Unknown

Opinion

2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 CHRISTIAN ELIEZ ORDONEZ Case No. 3:25-cv-00741-ART-CSD ORDER 6 Petitioner, v. 7 KRISTI NOEM, et al., 8 Respondents. 9 10 Petitioner Christian Eliez Ordonez Rugama, immigration detainee, has filed 11 a counseled Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (ECF 12 Nos. 1, 1-1.) Following a preliminary review of the Petition, the Court directs that 13 the Petition be served on Respondents and orders Respondents to file a response. 14 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY KINDLY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court: 15 1. DELIVER a copy of the Petition (ECF Nos. 1, 1-1) and this Order to 16 the U.S. Marshal for service. 17 2. ADD the United States Attorney for the District of Nevada to the 18 docket as an Interested Party. 19 3. SEND, through CM/ECF, a copy of the Petition (ECF Nos. 1, 1-1) and this Order to the United States Attorney’s Office for the District 20 of Nevada at Sigal.Chattah@usdoj.gov, Veronica.criste@usdoj.gov, 21 Summer.johnson@usdoj.gov, and caseview.ecf@usdoj.gov, in 22 accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b)(2)(E). 23 4. MAIL a copy of the Petition (ECF Nos. 1, 1-1) and this Order 24 pursuant to Rule 4(i)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to: 25 1) Kristi Noem, Secretary, United States Department of 26 Homeland Security, 245 Murray Lane SW, Washington, DC 20528 27 2) Pamela Bondi, Attorney General of the United States, 950 28 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20530 3) Todd Lyons, Acting Director and Senior Official Performing the 1 Duties of the Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs 5 Enforcement, 500 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20536 4) Jason Knight, Acting Las Vegas Field Office Director, 2975 3 Decker Lake Drive Suite 100, West Valley City, UT 84119- 6096 4 5) Darin Balaam, Sheriff, Washoe County Detention Center, 911 5 Parr Blvd, Reno, NV 89512

6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the U.S. Marshal SERVE a copy of the 7 || Petition (ECF Nos. 1, 1-1) and this Order on the United States Attorney for the 8 || District of Nevada or on an Assistant United States Attorney or clerical employee 9 || designated by the United State Attorney pursuant to Rule 4(i)(1)(A)(i) of the 10 || Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 11 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for Respondents file a notice of 12 || appearance within 2 days of the date of this Order and file and serve their 13 || response to the Petition within 7 days of the date of this Order, unless additional 14 || time is allowed for good cause shown. 15 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner has 7 days following the filing of 16 || the response to file a reply. 17 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall not transfer Petitioner 18 || out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting 19 || the court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary 20 || injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). Given the 21 || exigent circumstances, the Court finds that this order is warranted to maintain 22 || the status quo pending resolution on the merits and finds that Petitioner] has 23 || satisfied the factors governing the issuance of such preliminary relief. 24 25 DATED THIS 29th day of December, 2025. 26 jlo ‘ f Te 27 4 R. TRAUM 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christian Eliez Ordonez Rugama v. Kristi Noem, et al., (D. Nev. 2025).

Christian Eliez Ordonez Rugama v. Kristi Noem, et al. (Christian Eliez Ordonez Rugama v. Kristi Noem, et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Federal Trade Commission v. Dean Foods Co.
384 U.S. 597 (Supreme Court, 1966)