Christian Cyrus v. Suddenlink Communications

CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 6, 2020
Docket19-0640
StatusPublished

This text of Christian Cyrus v. Suddenlink Communications (Christian Cyrus v. Suddenlink Communications) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christian Cyrus v. Suddenlink Communications, (W. Va. 2020).

Opinion

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA

SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

CHRISTIAN CYRUS, FILED Claimant Below, Petitioner November 6, 2020 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK

vs.) No. 19-0640 (BOR Appeal No. 2053880) SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA (Claim No. 2016019282)

SUDDENLINK COMMUNICATIONS, Employer Below, Respondent

MEMORANDUM DECISION Petitioner Christian Cyrus, by Counsel Reginald D. Henry, appeals the decision of the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review (“Board of Review”). Suddenlink Communications, by Counsel Steven K. Wellman, filed a timely response.

The issues on appeal are permanent partial disability and medical benefits. The claims administrator granted a 4% permanent partial disability award on June 2, 2017. On July 23, 2018, the claims administrator denied a request for the medications Flexeril, Depo-Medrol, and Ketorolac. The Workers’ Compensation Office of Judges (“Office of Judges”) affirmed the decisions in its January 16, 2019, Order. The Order was affirmed by the Board of Review on June 17, 2019.

The Court has carefully reviewed the records, written arguments, and appendices contained in the briefs, and the case is mature for consideration. The facts and legal arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Upon consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record presented, the Court finds no substantial question of law and no prejudicial error. For these reasons, a memorandum decision is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Mr. Cyrus, a broad band technician, was injured in the course of his employment on January 19, 2016, when he slipped and fell on ice. The Employees’ and Physicians’ Report of Injury indicates he was diagnosed with neck strain, low back strain, left hip sprain, left elbow contusion, and unspecified head injury. A brain CT scan showed no evidence of acute injury or skull fracture. Cervical x-rays showed no evidence of acute fracture or dislocation. Lumbar x-rays showed no acute fracture or dislocation. They also showed facet arthropathy from T12-L2 and L3- S1. 1 Mr. Cyrus has a history of left shoulder issues. On November 29, 2014, he underwent a left shoulder MRI which showed a partial thickness tear of the bursal surface of the supraspinatus; attenuation of the biceps long head tendon, which placed it at risk for a full thickness tear; and a questionable posterior labral tear. On February 17, 2015, Mr. Cyrus underwent a left shoulder arthroscopy and subacromial decompression for a partial left shoulder rotator cuff tear.

Mr. Cyrus sought treatment from New River Health. On January 21, 2016, he saw Crystal Cooper, PA-C, for his work-related fall and reported headaches, left shoulder pain, and elbow pain. On May 17, 2016, he was diagnosed with trochanteric bursitis. On July 22, 2016, Mr. Cyrus reported that he was sitting at home on July 18, 2016, when he turned his head and heard a loud pop in his neck, followed by immediate pain. He stated that a few days later, he was playing badminton and heard another pop in his neck. On September 6, 2016, Mr. Cyrus reported that he was working full time and that his left hip pain had resolved. On February 22, 2017, a cervical MRI was reviewed and interpreted as showing disc displacement but no impingement. A left shoulder MRI showed fraying in the rotator cuff that was likely chronic. Mr. Cyrus was diagnosed with rotator cuff tendon tear, left shoulder pain, trochanteric bursitis, and knee sprain. He returned on April 18, 2017, and reported neck pain, right arm numbness, and decreased right hand function. Mr. Cyrus was diagnosed with knee sprain, rotator cuff tendon tear, and left shoulder pain and tingling. On August 7, 2017, he was seen for left shoulder pain. His hip bursitis had resolved. Mr. Cyrus was diagnosed with knee sprain, left shoulder joint pain, and upper back pain. The claim was held compensable for neck strain, low back sprain, left hip sprain, left elbow contusion, and head injury on February 1, 2016.

A September 20, 2016, cervical MRI showed a shallow non-compressive disc displacement at C3-4, a non-compressive disc displacement at C5-6, and a shallow disc displacement at C6-7 causing slight deformity of the thecal sac. A left shoulder MRI showed advanced degenerative labrum changes, a thickened glenohumeral ligament, significant improvement in the biceps tendon, and superficial fraying consistent with chronic partial thickness tear with a more pronounced scar.

Joseph Grady, M.D., performed an independent medical evaluation on April 11, 2017, in which he noted that Mr. Cyrus had a left shoulder rotator cuff repair a year earlier. He diagnosed cervical sprain superimposed on preexisting cervical spondylosis, lumbar sprain superimposed on preexisting degenerative spondylosis, left hip sprain, and left shoulder sprain superimposed on a preexisting rotator cuff tear. Dr. Grady noted that Mr. Cyrus had the preexisting conditions of multilevel lumbar facet arthropathy of the lumbar spine and multilevel cervical spondylosis, based on imaging studies. He had reached maximum medical improvement. Dr. Grady assessed 0% impairment for the left elbow contusion and head injury. For the cervical spine, Dr. Grady assessed 3% impairment for range of motion loss. He then placed Mr. Cyrus in Cervical Category II of West Virginia Code of State Rules § 85-20, which allows for 5-8% impairment. Dr. Grady therefore adjusted the rating to 5%; however, he apportioned 3% for preexisting conditions. For the lumbar spine and left hip, Dr. Grady assessed 0% impairment. For the left shoulder, he assessed 4% but apportioned 2% for a preexisting left shoulder injury. Dr. Grady’s total impairment assessment for

2 the compensable injury was 4%. The claims administrator granted a 4% permanent partial disability award on June 2, 2017, based on Dr. Grady’s evaluation.

A June 5, 2017, treatment note by Trista Bunty, PA, indicates Mr. Cyrus was seen for lower back pain, left shoulder pain, and numbness and tingling into the left leg. Ms. Bunty diagnosed low back pain and prescribed Depo-Medrol, Ketorolac, and Flexeril.

Michael Kominsky, D.C., performed an independent medical evaluation on March 6, 2018, in which he noted the compensable conditions as neck strain, low back strain, left hip sprain, left elbow contusion, head injury, and left shoulder contusion. Dr. Kominsky diagnosed chronic cervical sprain/strain, left elbow contusion, chronic left hip dysfunction, chronic lumbar sprain/strain, and left shoulder contusion. Mr. Cyrus had reached maximum medical improvement. Dr. Kominsky assessed 6% left shoulder impairment and apportioned 3% to the compensable injury. For the left hip, he found 2% impairment. He assessed 7% cervical impairment and placed Mr. Cyrus in Cervical Category II. He apportioned 2% to preexisting degenerative changes. For the lumbar spine, Dr. Kominsky found 8% range of motion impairment. Dr. Kominsky’s total impairment assessment was 18%.

The claims administrator stated in a March 15, 2018, email to Mr. Cyrus that the claim was never formally accepted for the left shoulder. It stated that treatment was covered, and a permanent partial disability award was given for the left shoulder, but there was never a formal compensability ruling. On June 5, 2017, Ms. Brunty requested authorization of Depo-Medrol, Ketorolac, and Flexeril, as well as an MRI. She completed a work excuse indicating Mr. Cyrus was taken off of work from June 11, 2018, through June 25, 2018. On June 15, 2018, Mr. Cyrus completed a claim reopening application, alleging that he suffered an aggravation or progression of his compensable injury. He stated that he had a recent flare-up of pain and was unable to work. In a June 22, 2018, diagnosis update, Ms.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christian Cyrus v. Suddenlink Communications, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christian-cyrus-v-suddenlink-communications-wva-2020.