Christian Church of Floydada v. Murray

Court of Appeals of Texas

Christian Church of Floydada v. Murray

67 S.W.2d 387

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 2, 1933

DocketNo. 11614.

StatusPublished

This text of 67 S.W.2d 387 (Christian Church of Floydada v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Christian Church of Floydada v. Murray, 67 S.W.2d 387 (Tex. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

*388 BOND, Justice.

This record discloses an analogous situation to that in the case of J. T. Kirk, Appellant, v. Owen M. Murray, Receiver, Appellee, 67 S.W.(2d) 385, this day decided by this court, involving paving certificates of the same series issued by the same municipality, in which we held that the receiver's cause of action is amenable to the venue statutes of this state (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 1995), and the conclusion therein reached is applb cable to the contentions here raised; on the strength of our holding in the above-^ited case, the judgment of the lower court is reversed and remanded, appellant’s plea of privilege is sustained and the suit transferred to the district court of Floyd county, in accordance with the relating statutes.

Reversed and remanded, with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*388 BOND, Justice.

This record discloses an analogous situation to that in the case of J. T. Kirk, Appellant, v. Owen M. Murray, Receiver, Appellee, 67 S.W.(2d) 385, this day decided by this court, involving paving certificates of the same series issued by the same municipality, in which we held that the receiver's cause of action is amenable to the venue statutes of this state (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 1995), and the conclusion therein reached is applb cable to the contentions here raised; on the strength of our holding in the above-^ited case, the judgment of the lower court is reversed and remanded, appellant’s plea of privilege is sustained and the suit transferred to the district court of Floyd county, in accordance with the relating statutes.

Reversed and remanded, with instructions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 S.W.2d 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christian-church-of-floydada-v-murray-texapp-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack