Christian Chambliss v. Enclave at Brinker

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: September 21, 2023
• Docket: 02-23-00117-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00117-CV ___________________________

CHRISTIAN CHAMBLISS, Appellant

V.

ENCLAVE AT BRINKER, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. CV-2023-01014-JP

Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On August 21, 2023, we notified Appellant Christian Chambliss that an

appellant’s brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P.

38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless,

within ten days, Appellant filed with the court an appellant’s brief and an

accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an

extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have

received no response.

Because Appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an

opportunity to explain the initial failure to do so, we dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: September 21, 2023