Christian Aurelio Urrutia v. State
This text of Christian Aurelio Urrutia v. State (Christian Aurelio Urrutia v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-15-00214-CR
CHRISTIAN AURELIO URRUTIA, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 47th District Court Randall County, Texas Trial Court No. 24,177-A, Honorable Richard Dambold, Presiding
September 10, 2015
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
Appellant, Christian Aurelio Urrutia, appeals an order modifying the terms of his
community supervision.1 We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
The State moved to dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction because the
modification order is not a judgment of guilt or an appealable order. See TEX. R. APP. P.
25.2(a)(2). Appellant filed a response and concurs with the State’s motion.
1 On April 28, 2015, the trial court entered a Continuation and Modification Special Conditions order. It has long been held that an order modifying the conditions of community
supervision is not an appealable order. See Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1977); accord, Borner v. State, No. 05-15-00465-CR, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS
7495, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas July 21, 2015, no pet. h.) (stating the same).
Accordingly, we grant the State’s motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal for
lack of jurisdiction.
Brian Quinn Chief Justice
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Christian Aurelio Urrutia v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christian-aurelio-urrutia-v-state-texapp-2015.