Christian Angel Zubia v. the State of Texas
This text of Christian Angel Zubia v. the State of Texas (Christian Angel Zubia v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-23-00222-CR
CHRISTIAN ANGEL ZUBIA, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 222nd District Court Deaf Smith County, Texas Trial Court No. CR-2022I-141, Honorable Roland D. Saul, Presiding
March 27, 2024 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Christian Angel Zubia appealed his conviction for murder and sentence. His brief
was originally due January 17, 2024, but we granted his retained counsel, Charles
Blevins, an extension to February 16, 2024. Counsel filed no brief on behalf of appellant.
By letter dated February 26, 2024, we admonished Blevins that the failure to file a brief
by March 7 would result in the appeal being abated and the cause remanded to the trial
court for further proceedings. In response, counsel filed a “Letter of Intent to Dismiss
Appeal” on March 7, 2024 and represented therein that appellant intended to file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal. To date, however, we have received neither a motion
to dismiss nor an appellant’s brief.
Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further
proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall
determine the following:
(1) whether appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;
(2) whether appellant is indigent;
(3) why a timely appellate brief has not been filed on appellant’s behalf;
(4) whether appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeal;
(5) whether appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel;
(6) whether new counsel should be appointed; and
(7) if appellant desires to continue the appeal, the date on which the appellant’s brief will be filed.
The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by April 26, 2024.
If it is determined that appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent, and has
been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint him new
counsel; the name, address, email address, telephone number, and state bar number of
any newly appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings.
2 Should appellant’s counsel file either a brief or a motion to voluntarily dismiss the
appeal before April 12, 2024, he is directed to immediately notify the trial court of the
filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall not be required to take any further action.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Christian Angel Zubia v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christian-angel-zubia-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.