Christi Lynn DiStefano

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii·Decided March 3, 2025·No. 24-00645·Unknown

Opinion

Date Signed: March 3, 2025 ky ee SO ORDERED.

Wey Robert J. Faris Ser oF ge United States Bankruptcy Judge

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

DISTRICT OF HAWAII

In re: Case No.: 24-00645 Chapter 13 CHRISTI LYNN DISTEFANO,

Debtor. Related: ECF 10

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON CLAIM OF EXEMPTIONS

Chapter 7 debtor Christi Lynn DiStefano claimed an exemption in

real property located in Hawaii which she owns as tenants by the entirety with her husband. Creditor Endurance American Insurance Company objects to the claim of exemptions. I will SUSTAIN the objection in part and

OVERRULE it in part, as follows:

Ms. DiStefano is entitled to the benefits of the tenancy by the entirety under Hawaii law. Endurance claims that Ms. DiStefano is domiciled in

New York state and that therefore she is not entitled to the Hawaii tenancy

by the entirety exemption. Endurance incorrectly relies on § 522(b)(3)(A), which provides that the law of the debtor’s domicile governs certain

exemptions. But the exemption for entireties property rests on § 522(b)(3)(B). That section provides that a debtor may claim an exemption

in tenancy by the entirety property “to the extent that such interest as a tenant by the entirety . . . is exempt from process under applicable

nonbankruptcy law . . . .” At least as far as real estate is concerned, “applicable nonbankruptcy law” is the law of the situs of the real estate,

and not the law of the debtor’s domicile. See Holland v. Safanda (In re Holland), 366 B.R. 825, 830 (N.D. Ill. 2007).

Under Hawaii law, entireties property is exempt from the individual debts of each spouse but is available to the joint creditors of both spouses.

Sawada v. Endo, 57 Haw. 608, 612 (1977). Therefore, the objection is SUSTAINED if and to the extent that

Endurance or any other creditor is a joint creditor of Ms. and Mr. DiStefano

2 and is OVERRULED if and to the extent that Endurance or any other

creditor is a creditor of only Ms. or Mr. DiStefano. This order does not determine whether or to what extent Endurance

is a joint or individual creditor, whether Endurance holds a lien on the subject property that cannot be avoided, or the amount of Endurance’s

allowed claim.

END OF ORDER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christi Lynn DiStefano, (Haw. 2025).

Christi Lynn DiStefano (Christi Lynn DiStefano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sawada v. Endo
561 P.2d 1291 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1977)
Holland v. Safanda (In Re Holland)
366 B.R. 825 (N.D. Illinois, 2007)