Christenson v. Pincus
This text of 117 A.D. 810 (Christenson v. Pincus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaint alleges two causes of action, one for' conversion and one on contract, for goods sold and delivered. The.plaintiff [811]*811might have waived the tort in his pleading and then the action would have proceeded as one on contract. This he has not seen fit to do, and defendant was entitled to' have the causes of action separated and numbered. (Code Civ. Proc. § 483.) It lias become the settled practice that a plaintiff will be required to elect at the trial as to which of two causes of action he will try, and that would have been quite proper in this case, .but defendant had the right, at his option, before' answering to move to have the causes of action separated1 and numbered, and plaintiff would have been in time, even upon the motion to eléct, to waive the tort and proceed Upon the one cause of action. He failed to avail himself - of the opportunity given him by the learned justice at Special Term to do this, and the order must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. ’
Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Gayhor and Miller, JJ., concurred.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 A.D. 810, 102 N.Y.S. 1041, 38 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 371, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christenson-v-pincus-nyappdiv-1907.