Christensen v. Nguyen

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA COREY D. CHRISTENSEN, Case No.: 2:20-cv-01770-APG-DJA 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case SH v. Without Prejudice ROCHELLE T. NGUYEN and MATTHEW [ECF No. 8] LAY, 7 Defendants 8 On December 3, 2020, Magistrate Judge Albregts recommended that I dismiss this case 9 without prejudice because plaintiff Corey Christensen did not file an amended complaint by the 10 given deadline. ECF No. 8. Christensen did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de 11 novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts 12 to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings 13 to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) 14 (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations 15 de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Albregts’ report and recommendation 17 (ECF No. 8) is accepted and this case is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is 18 instructed to close this case. 19 DATED this 6th day of January, 2021. 20 21 ( Zoe ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23