Christensen v. Morse Dry Dock and Repair Company

154 N.E. 616, 243 N.Y. 587, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 864
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 9, 1926·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The stipulation for judgment absolute herein filed is made subject to the qualification that it is “ without prejudice to the right of the defendant, appellant, to appeal from said affirmance to the Supreme Court of the United States,” etc. The stipulation for judgment absolute (N. Y. Const, art. 6, § 7; Civ. Prac. Act, § 588, subd. 2) which must be filed to give this court jurisdiction on an appeal from an order granting a new trial is in effect a stipulation for judgment by consent in case of affirmance and should, therefore, be unqualified. This court may not dispense with the constitutional limitation on the right of appeal.

The appeal should be dismissed, with costs.

Hiscock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christensen v. Morse Dry Dock and Repair Company, 154 N.E. 616, 243 N.Y. 587, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 864 (N.Y. 1926).

154 N.E. 616 (Christensen v. Morse Dry Dock and Repair Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Probate of the Will of Phillips
198 Misc. 879 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1950)
Weiman v. Weiman
65 N.E.2d 754 (New York Court of Appeals, 1946)