Christensen v. Christensen

10 A.2d 735, 127 N.J. Eq. 13, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 569
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 25, 1940
StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.2d 735 (Christensen v. Christensen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christensen v. Christensen, 10 A.2d 735, 127 N.J. Eq. 13, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 569 (N.J. 1940).

Opinion

*14 Per Curiam.

We have examined with care the decree of the court below,, the pleadings of the parties, the evidence in the cause, and the arguments of counsel, and we consider that the decree is entirely justified. It will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trencharb, Case,. Bobine, Donges, Hehbr, Perskie, Porter, Hetfielb,. Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 14.

For reversal — -None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 A.2d 735, 127 N.J. Eq. 13, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christensen-v-christensen-nj-1940.