Christensen v. Christensen

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Christensen v. Christensen

10 A.2d 735, 127 N.J. Eq. 13, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 569

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 25, 1940·Published

Opinion

*14 Per Curiam.

We have examined with care the decree of the court below,, the pleadings of the parties, the evidence in the cause, and the arguments of counsel, and we consider that the decree is entirely justified. It will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trencharb, Case,. Bobine, Donges, Hehbr, Perskie, Porter, Hetfielb,. Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 14.

For reversal — -None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*14 Per Curiam.

We have examined with care the decree of the court below,, the pleadings of the parties, the evidence in the cause, and the arguments of counsel, and we consider that the decree is entirely justified. It will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trencharb, Case,. Bobine, Donges, Hehbr, Perskie, Porter, Hetfielb,. Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 14.

For reversal — -None.

Christensen v. Christensen, 10 A.2d 735, 127 N.J. Eq. 13, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 569 (N.J. 1940).

Pincite

10 A.2d 735 (Christensen v. Christensen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.