Christensen v. Christensen

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Christensen v. Christensen

876 So. 2d 28, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6805, 2004 WL 1091422

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 18, 2004·No. No. 1D03-5251·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s responses to the Court’s orders of December 30, 2003, and January 29, 2004, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is not a final order because related claims remain pending below. See Hoffman v. O’Connor, 802 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The appellant’s “Motion for Extension of Time for the Clerk of the Court,” filed on January 26, 2004, is denied as moot.

BARFIELD, BROWNING and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s responses to the Court’s orders of December 30, 2003, and January 29, 2004, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is not a final order because related claims remain pending below. See Hoffman v. O’Connor, 802 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The appellant’s “Motion for Extension of Time for the Clerk of the Court,” filed on January 26, 2004, is denied as moot.

BARFIELD, BROWNING and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Christensen v. Christensen, 876 So. 2d 28, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6805, 2004 WL 1091422 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

876 So. 2d 28 (Christensen v. Christensen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related