Christensen, Ex Parte Bruce L.

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 31, 2007
DocketAP-75,602
StatusPublished

This text of Christensen, Ex Parte Bruce L. (Christensen, Ex Parte Bruce L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christensen, Ex Parte Bruce L., (Tex. 2007).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. AP-75,602
EX PARTE BRUCE L. CHRISTENSEN Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2001-CR-4986-W1 IN THE 226
TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM BEXAR COUNTY

Per curiam.



O P I N I O N



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of three counts of aggravated sexual assault and sentenced to thirty years' imprisonment for each conviction. The Fourth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Christensen v. State, No. 04-02-00397-CR (Tex. App.-San Antonio, delivered July 16, 2003, no pet.).

Applicant contends that he pleaded no contest to count nine of the indictment, which alleged sexual assault. He argues that he should have been sentenced to two to twenty years for sexual assault, but was instead sentenced to thirty years for aggravated sexual assault. In addition, he contends that trial counsel was ineffective for advising him that he had been charged with ten counts of aggravated sexual assault. We remanded the application to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Trial counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit and testimony from Applicant, the trial court found that counsel's advice was not deficient and concluded that counsel was not ineffective. We agree. The trial court, however, found that Applicant pleaded no contest to count nine of the indictment, sexual assault, and that Applicant should have been convicted of two counts of aggravated sexual assault and one count of sexual assault. The trial court recommended that we vacate Applicant's conviction and punishment for count nine. We agree.

Accordingly, relief is granted in part. The judgment, as it relates to count nine of the indictment, in Cause No. 2001-CR-4986 in the 226th Judicial District Court of Bexar County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Bexar County to answer the charges against him.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.



Delivered: January 31, 2007

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christensen, Ex Parte Bruce L., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christensen-ex-parte-bruce-l-texcrimapp-2007.