Christenfeld v. Davidson

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Christenfeld v. Davidson

92 N.Y.S. 1119

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMarch 3, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 92 N.Y.S. 1119 (Christenfeld v. Davidson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Christenfeld v. Davidson, 92 N.Y.S. 1119 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We are unable to distinguish the contract involved in this action from that which was considered in Jacobs v. Cohen (Sup.) 90 N. Y. Supp. 854, and was condemned by the Appellate Division of the Second Department as contrary to public policy and void. Upon the authority of that case, the judgment must be reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with costs to the appellant in this court and the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We are unable to distinguish the contract involved in this action from that which was considered in Jacobs v. Cohen (Sup.) 90 N. Y. Supp. 854, and was condemned by the Appellate Division of the Second Department as contrary to public policy and void. Upon the authority of that case, the judgment must be reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with costs to the appellant in this court and the court below.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 N.Y.S. 1119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christenfeld-v-davidson-nyappterm-1905.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack