Christenfeld v. Davidson

92 N.Y.S. 1119
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided March 3, 1905·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We are unable to distinguish the contract involved in this action from that which was considered in Jacobs v. Cohen (Sup.) 90 N. Y. Supp. 854, and was condemned by the Appellate Division of the Second Department as contrary to public policy and void. Upon the authority of that case, the judgment must be reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with costs to the appellant in this court and the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christenfeld v. Davidson, 92 N.Y.S. 1119 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

92 N.Y.S. 1119 (Christenfeld v. Davidson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jacobs v. Cohen
99 A.D. 481 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)